Monday, 31 August, 2009

Test post on a new computer

Hey y’all. So I got a nice little netbook computer today, from which I will be updating the Blog of Walker for the next few weeks. The whole ‘test post’ thing has to do with my testing out a new feature that Windows Live offers, called Windows Live Writer, which I can write to like a Wordpad or Notebook document, but which then posts my written material to a website of my choice. Pretty cool.

Anyway, that’s about enough for me for today. I’m tired – I didn’t sleep at all last night, I travelled from Vancouver Island to Calgary, and I bought a new computer, whose battery is charging up as I type.

I really should try and get some decent writing time in, but quite frankly, if I don’t have an excuse today, then what’s the point of being sleep-deprived, on foreign soil ( well, not technically ), and adjusting to a new, much smaller and more compact keyboard. It’s hard folks. It’s hard.

Stay tuned.

Posting may be light

Hey y'all. This is just to let you know that I'm going to be spending some time on holidays over the next three weeks or so, and so my blogging may become a bit sporadic. Especially to this blog - my first priority is going to be to The Lynch Mob, and then this site, while I'm gone.

It's not that I won't be trying to find time to blog. It's just that I might not have a lot of time to begin with. I'll also be mostly offline ( as far as blogging is concerned, anyway ) for the first day or so after I leave ( tomorrow ), and so there will probably be no blogging whatsoever until I'm back up and running.

So, until then. Cheers!

( By the way, if you're desperate for some of my content, why not mosey on down to Heartless and Brainless, where I've got an article posted up on why Bernie Farber's got it wrong. Also, you can check out my latest column, which I've recently discovered to be more widely circulated than previously thought. )

Sunday, 30 August, 2009

An executive decision

As of today, I will no longer be posting a Mark Madness segment to this blog.

It's not that I've stopped being a fan of Mark Steyn's. Far from it.

I started the Mark Madness segment during that whole 'BC Human Rights Tribunal' brouhaha a year or so back, as a way to keep up with all of the buzz surrounding the Macleans case and trial, and the coverage, although along the way I included videos of Mark speaking here or there, links to his writing, etc.

And as the days and weeks went by, the Mark Madness segment evolved, as most things do when you repeat them over and over again, and streamlined. I linked to anybody that I could find who was talking about Mark Steyn, in any context, concerning any topic, and I followed his website, linking to the writings posted there, to his blog, to NRO's The Corner, and so forth.

But, as you can imagine, while this didn't require a huge amount of effort on my part, it still took up its fair share of my blogging efforts and energies. And while I enjoyed putting together the segment, and having that segment linked over at the House of Binks, I think it's time that I put an end to this particular running segment, and this particular throwback to much earlier blogging days.

It wasn't terribly long ago, after all, when I was running three such segments: The Levant-Jaunt, the Iranian Fun, and the Mark Madness. I seem to have an affinity for just straight-up linking to other people, without adding any content of my own...

Iranian Fun was the first to go, followed, somewhat regretfully, by the Levant-Jaunt. Now it's time for the Mark Madness segment to go the way of its deceased brethren.

And I will still be posting on Mark Steyn, on this blog, and I will still be posting his latest material, and perhaps even some of the commentary directed his way, to the Mark Steyn Fan Page on Facebook, which I run ( yeah, I'm a fanboy - deal with it ). Not to mention that I'm still running the blog Defend Geert Wilders, which was essentially created to be a news aggregator for all things Geert Wilders.

So, anyway. I posted the last Mark Madness today, so...that's that. I hope y'all enjoyed it while it lasted. I know I did.

Cheers.

The Nexus of Assholery: The Inglourious War

The Nexus of Assholery: The Inglourious War

No trademark on free speech

By Nathalie Des Rosiers, via The Toronto Star:
In 1983, the famous manufacturer of Perrier sparkling water sued a Canadian jokester who had created "Pierre Eh!" bottles that closely resembled its distinctively shaped green bottles.
The Pierre Eh! bottles were created to mock Pierre Elliott Trudeau, sold for $4 (as opposed to a real bottle of Perrier, which then cost about a dollar), and had a limited potential market. Nevertheless, Perrier sued for trademark infringement – and won. Pierre Eh! had to be abandoned.
As one commentator explained, the courts were "not amused," refusing to consider humour, parody or political criticism an excuse for trademark infringement.
Fast forward to 2009, where we now have Wal-Mart seeking an injunction on the same basis, trademark infringement, in an attempt to have a union dismantle its website, walmartworkerscanada.ca.
The order sought by Wal-Mart would require that the union not use the words "Wal-Mart" or "Wal-Mart Workers," not make fun of the Wal-Mart slogan "Save Money. Live Better," not use oval signs similar to Wal-Mart signs, etc.
If successful, the scope of this injunction order could easily have the effect of silencing Wal-Mart's opponents. In response, the union is challenging this use of trademark protection by Wal-Mart – as well it should.
In seeking an injunction, Wal-Mart is misusing intellectual property laws. Trademark and copyright protections exist to prevent commercial free-riders from exploiting the investments that businesses make in their products and marketing.
These protections are not designed to insulate corporations from public criticism. The union is obviously not trying to pass itself off as a Wal-Mart store; rather, it is criticizing Wal-Mart's employment practices.
Trademark and copyright protections should be interpreted to allow exceptions for political speech, parody and satire. Freedom of expression should permit parodies on political leaders, such as Pierre Eh!, which is indeed a legal development that has taken place in many other countries.
But trademark and copyright protections should also permit public criticism of corporate actors. Political speech is not only speech about governmental actions.
At a time when the private sector is under the microscope for having mismanaged risks in the market, citizens should be entitled to express their concerns regarding the ways in which corporate actors behave.
In a neo-liberal economy, corporations are powerful actors. Wal-Mart, for example, advertises average net sales of $100 billion per quarter – which makes it bigger than many governments.
It makes no sense that citizens would be allowed to criticize fully their municipal, provincial and national leaders, using parody and humour, but be prevented from using humour to oppose Wal-Mart's practices.
As with any powerful corporate citizen or public figure, Wal-Mart has to accept that with fame comes criticism. A responsible corporate citizen does not seek to silence its critics, but to engage in the debate.
Read the rest here.

The Weekly Mark Madness

Or semi-weekly. Whatever. I'm no smart fella.

Links Steynian:

Betty's Page

Blue Crab Boulevard

Conservatives 4 Palin

Don Surber

Amplify, with more here, and here.

David Ogilvie

A Dime A Dozen Political Blog

Enormous Thriving Plants

Marathon Pundit

Right Wing News, with more here.

Sharpe Stick

EconoSpeak

The Athiest Conservative

Centurean2's Weblog, with more here.

Xtra.ca

DesMoinesRegister.com

Gun Barrel Authority

The Cynical Economist

An Undercurrent of Hostility

The Spyglass

Music

Contra Celsum

The 519 Blog

Macleans' Need To Know

Gaping Whole

Another Pundit

Big Blue Wave

As Maine Goes

Kathy Shaidle

Seldom Wrong, Never in Doubt

American Thinker

Shining City

Small Dead Animals

The Western Experience

The Huffington Riposte

Content Steynian:

In NRO's The Corner:

The price of justice

The Ten-month Wait for the Maternity Ward, Cont. (Yet Again)

Prostration is the Better Part of Valor

Learning to Live with Islam

Stimulus in a Nutshell

The ten-month wait for the maternity ward (cont)

You'll Feel Like a Kid Again

Mark's song of the week: Vaya Con Dios

On the Hugh Hewitt show: Mark Steyn with a realistic remembrance of Ted Kennedy

On stage and screen: Sauntering On

In Macleans: Do you notice anything shrivelling?

On America: Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death Panels

In the OC Register and the National Review: Airbrushing out Mary Jo Kopechne

On culture: Brewing and Breeding

Five years ago: The Jihad Goes Mainstream

In the Washington Times and the OC Register: Stimulus hits a pothole

Ten years ago: Over Here We Can Defend Our Homes

On books: Talking Immigration

Guest-hosting the Rush Limbaugh program: August 18th

On America: Plugging Healthcare

On the world: The Ten-Month Wait For The Maternity Ward

On the Hugh Hewitt show: Mark Steyn's MST3K of Newsweeks' podcast

Mark's song of the week: As Time Goes By

Mark's request of the week: The Lion That Didn't Roar

In Macleans: What made Budd Schulberg run

On stage and screen: The Biggest Star

Ave atque vale: What Made Buddy Run

In Mark's blog:

Forty shades of taxpayer green...

Jennifer Lynch: Please send reinforcements!

On Canada and the Commonwealth: Hot New Talent Flees The Blogosphere!

Plus, more links Steynian, Levantian, and Freespeechian over at Free Canuckistan.

Friday, 28 August, 2009

Well that's, erm...a bit worrying

Obama hits the inter-webz! By Declan McCullagh, via CNet News:

Bill would give president emergency control of Internet Politics and Law - CNET News

Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.
They're not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (
excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.
The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.
"I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness," said Larry Clinton, president of the
Internet Security Alliance, which counts representatives of Verizon, Verisign, Nortel, and Carnegie Mellon University on its board. "It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill."
Representatives of other large Internet and telecommunications companies expressed concerns about the bill in a teleconference with Rockefeller's aides this week, but were not immediately available for interviews on Thursday.
A spokesman for Rockefeller also declined to comment on the record Thursday, saying that many people were unavailable because of the summer recess. A Senate source familiar with the bill compared the president's power to take control of portions of the Internet to what President Bush did when grounding all aircraft on Sept. 11, 2001. The source said that one primary concern was the electrical grid, and what would happen if it were attacked from a broadband connection.
When Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Commerce committee, and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced the original bill in April, they
claimed it was vital to protect national cybersecurity. "We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs--from our water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic health records," Rockefeller said.
The Rockefeller proposal plays out against a broader concern in Washington, D.C., about the government's role in cybersecurity. In May, President Obama
acknowledged that the government is "not as prepared" as it should be to respond to disruptions and announced that a new cybersecurity coordinator position would be created inside the White House staff. Three months later, that post remains empty, one top cybersecurity aide has quit, and some wags have begun to wonder why a government that receives failing marks on cybersecurity should be trusted to instruct the private sector what to do.
Rockefeller's revised legislation seeks to reshuffle the way the federal government addresses the topic. It requires a "cybersecurity workforce plan" from every federal agency, a "dashboard" pilot project, measurements of hiring effectiveness, and the implementation of a "comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy" in six months--even though its mandatory legal review will take a year to complete.
The privacy implications of sweeping changes implemented before the legal review is finished worry
Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. "As soon as you're saying that the federal government is going to be exercising this kind of power over private networks, it's going to be a really big issue," he says.

[...]

Update at 3:14 p.m. PDT: I just talked to Jena Longo, deputy communications director for the Senate Commerce committee, on the phone. She sent me e-mail with this statement:


The president of the United States has always had the constitutional authority, and duty, to protect the American people and direct the national response to any emergency that threatens the security and safety of the United States. The Rockefeller-Snowe Cybersecurity bill makes it clear that the president's authority includes securing our national cyber infrastructure from attack. The section of the bill that addresses this issue, applies specifically to the national response to a severe attack or natural disaster. This particular legislative language is based on longstanding statutory authorities for wartime use of communications networks. To be very clear, the Rockefeller-Snowe bill will not empower a "government shutdown or takeover of the Internet" and any suggestion otherwise is misleading and false. The purpose of this language is to clarify how the president directs the public-private response to a crisis, secure our economy and safeguard our financial networks, protect the American people, their privacy and civil liberties, and coordinate the government's response.


Unfortunately, I'm still waiting for an on-the-record answer to these four questions that I asked her colleague on Wednesday. I'll let you know if and when I get a response.

Read it all here.

Well, how could that go wrong, huh?

Why Bernie Farber's got it wrong

Read all about it, over at Heartless and Brainless.

Elizabeth May: smackdown!

Ouch! As Public Eye reports, Elizabeth May was the recipient of a pretty good smack-down, courtousy of one Briony Penn:
Former federal Liberal Saanich-Gulf Islands candidate Briony Penn has said she won't be supporting Green leader Elizabeth May in her bid to win that riding. Speaking with Public Eye, Ms. Penn, who had backed the Greens prior to becoming a Grit, said, "Before Elizabeth declared her intention, I had supported Renee Hetherington who is running in the nomination race for the Libs in the riding. And I'm still going to support her through her nomination race because she's a great person and I'm not going to drop her like a hot potato."
But that doesn't mean Ms. May didn't try to get Ms. Penn to endorse her. "Elizabeth did ask for my support. And I kind of had to point out, 'Where was yours six months ago?' Because I would have been in Ottawa right now if it had been there. And I had already made this commitment to Renee and I stick by it because she's a fabulous candidate."


Yeah...Saanich-Gulf Islands is going to work out real well for the Green Party.

New Walker column

I've been a bit lax in posting my column for the Cowichan Valley Citizen lately, but here's my latest: Where did the New Democratic Party go?
A few days after the BC Liberals' new Harmonized Sales Tax was announced, NDP finance critic Bruce Ralston stated that the Campbell administration "[N]eeds to answer questions about what this new tax will mean in terms of increased costs for services in British Columbia," and eight days after the tax was announced the NDP began circulating a petition against the 2010 HST.
By contrast, one man, consultant and columnist Bill Tieleman, started up a Facebook group -- in lieu of a petition -- a mere two days after the tax was announced, which as of this writing has over 90,000 members, and another man, retired premier Bill Vander Zalm, has become one of the loudest voices in denouncing the HST. Two men -- probably producing about a third of the PR against this new tax that can be scraped together by an entire provincial party.
That's pretty sad.
Read the rest here.

Thursday, 27 August, 2009

And Covenant Zone is back!

For now...

Having Enough for Life

Via The Simple Dollar:


I am absolutely honored to feature a guest post today by Vicki Robin, someone who I’ve had the privilege to get to know a little over the last year or so. Vicki is co-author of Your Money or Your Life, one of the books that changed my life. Currently, Vicki is teaching tele-classes about money and life as well as speaking, writing and consulting.


Financial independence – ahhh, what a dream! Doing as you please, not as you must. Having all the money you need without needing a job. Travel. Adventure. Relaxation. Time to write that book you’ve been thinking about for years.
Well, I’ve been there and done that since I was 25 years old. I’ve had an adventuresome life. I’ve worked for love, not money. I’ve slept late when my body needed it and worked late into the night when the juices were flowing. And I’ve written a book (actually two, one published) which lays out how anyone can have what I have – without risky business ventures or shady deals or being born into the right family. The book, of course, is
Your Money or Your Life, which presents a step by step approach to the process of earning, spending, saving, giving and investing with a focus on having enough for life, not “it all” or “more and more.”
We just updated it and, thanks to The Simple Dollar among other frugality sites, we were able to focus on the core strategy and let go of being the go-to people for how to save money on specific purchases.
I’d like to unpack this notion of “financial independence,” though, so we can see it not simply as being filthy rich with a mega portfolio but rather as having a diversity of ways to assure your needs will be met with minimal if any paid employment. It’s a combination of passive income, occasional income, frugality (increasing your unnecessary income) and reciprocity (freely sharing stuff, services and skills with others).

Read the rest here.

Peak Water

By Jim Quinn, via TheBurningPlatform.com:


“It should be obvious from simple arithmetic that population growth is on a direct collision course with increasingly scarce resources.” - Jeremy Grantham

The notion of peak water probably sounds crazy to most people. The earth is 70% covered by water. The water cycle replenishes water on a continuous basis. The global warming enthusiasts tell us that glaciers are melting and oceans are rising. This should make water more plentiful. But, as they say in the real estate business – Location, Location, Location. Freshwater shortages in the wrong places could have calamitous consequences to those regions, worldwide commodity prices, the economic future of nations with water shortages and possible war. Regional water scarcity means water usage exceeds the annual natural replenishment from the water cycle. The impact of water scarcity can be far reaching. It can lead to food shortages, famine, and starvation. Many nations, regions and states have mismanaged their water resources, and they will have to suffer the long-term consequences.

The peak oil debate gets a tremendous amount of press and generates heated disagreements on both sides. The focus on peak oil has permitted the future water crisis to stay under the radar. As usual, myopic self serving politicians have ignored resource issues for the last 30 years. These were 30 years of debt financed good times with relatively low prices for all natural resources and commodities. The end of this period of low prices is nigh. The brilliant investment manager Jeremy Grantham lays out the future in his recent newsletter:


“We must prepare ourselves for waves of higher resource prices and periods of shortages unlike anything we have faced outside of wartime conditions. In fact, I believe we are already several years into this painful transition but are still mostly invested in denying it.”


The following chart provides a useful comparison of oil and water as resources. While oil is non-renewable and limited, it is replaceable by other more costly alternatives. Water is renewable and relatively unlimited, but there is no substitute and it is only useful in the precise places. The Southwest region of the United States, our fastest growing region, has considerable freshwater constraints and could ultimately run out of water.

Read the rest here.

Laptop blamed for Vancouver man's fiery death

Via CTVBC.ca:
The B.C. Coroners Service issued a warning Wednesday to residents not to leave their computers running on soft surfaces, such as couches.
The warning came on the heels of the completion of an investigation into a fatal house fire in Vancouver earlier this year.
A 56-year-old man died Feb. 26 when a laptop overheated and caught fire within 50 minutes of being left on a couch, according to the Coroners Service.
The Coroners Service learned during its investigation that several laptop models have been recalled in recent years due to problems with lithium-ion batteries overheating and bursting into flames.
Since 2004, four other laptops have either overheated or short-circuited when left plugged in, sparking fires. In addition, there have been 15 fires caused by other electronic devices that short-circuited or overheated, such as personal computers, DVD players and cell phone chargers.
Read the rest here.

I try to be careful to make sure that my lap-top has enough ventilation, but I hadn't realized that if things turned south, it could go quite that badly.

Wednesday, 26 August, 2009

HST updates

If you're looking for some anti-harmonised sales tax reading, why not check out the site Fight HST, which I believe is run by Bill Vander Zalm, former SoCred premier and anti-HST-er at large.

And while you're at it, Publius at the Shotgun Blog has some interesting commentary:
Effective July 1st, 2010, the measure was sold as an administrative reform, allowing businesses to remit one set of tax paperwork rather than two. The only catch, which the government has been spinning hard against anyone noticing, is that the harmonization will require the PST to cover as many goods and services as the GST. Since the latter is far more encompassing, this is among the biggest tax hikes in the province's history. The desperate hope of the Grits is that the added revenue will help plug the government's massive deficit. By October 2011, the date of the next election, the additional revenues will no doubt help the government. They will also begin to pinch the electorate. Here's to reminding them of eight years of broken promises, mediocre government and a steadily increasing tax burden.

Read it all here.

Welcome to Toronto!

Party hardy, and don't worry - we've got top-notch healthcare facilities if you party a little too hardy.

Geez - if given the choice, ship me off to a witch-doctor, huh?

[ UPDATE: British healthcare at its best, too. ]

Really, says business, HST is good for you

By Les Leyne, via the Victoria Times Colonist:
'What's good for the B.C. Chamber of Commerce is good for B.C."
"What's good for the B.C. Pulp and Paper Steering Committee is good for B.C."
Or how about this one: "What's good for the Western Convenience Store Association is good for B.C."
That was the general theme of the business world's delayed counter-offensive to the wave of resentment about the harmonized sales tax that has been building for the past month.
Various business groups testified to the benefits of opening your hearts to the HST and accepting it as your personal saviour at a media conference yesterday.
You can take the old "what's good for General Motors... " dictum and substitute the local business organization of your choice.
Initiatives Prince George. New Car Dealers of B.C. Greater Vancouver Gateway Council.
But not all of them.
The real estate industry was missing. So was the restaurant industry, which is firmly opposed.
Still, supporters of the HST managed to get 23 business groups to sign commitments supporting the B.C. Liberals' gamble.
Read the rest here.

Announcing: Debatepedia

Check it out.

Tuesday, 25 August, 2009

Warren Kinsella less hack-ey than we might think?

Jesse Ferreras asks the question: is it possible that Warren Kinsella isn't such a hack? The answer, of course, is yes and no.
I've read much of Jean Chretien's time in office and never once did Warren Kinsella's name jump out at me as his chief strategist or as the head of any "war room" for the party.Well tonight I picked up Lawrence Martin's "Iron Man" again and discovered that Warren played a much bigger role than I ever gave him credit for.He was a lapdog for Jean Chretien - the kind of guy I would have admired in my younger days when I considered myself a Liberal. He was fiercely loyal and, according to the book, was among the first who saw Paul Martin coming around the corner. He was a pit bull for the Prime Minister, in charge of gathering up dirt on his opponents. In Lawrence Martin's estimation he didn't seem half-bad at it.Paramount among his actions, of course, is his invoking of Barney the Dinosaur on Canada AM, lampooning Stockwell Day's creationist beliefs. It's the crowning moment of his career, and something he still reminds us about.I'm no political expert - I've seen nothing close to the experience that Warren has. I'm willing to grant that he had something of a significant role in Chretien's time but I still think he's a censorious, self-aggrandizing shmuck who refuses to open his eyes to the abuses that human rights commissions are meting out on Canadians. Neither I nor any other free speechie would be so hard on him if he'd just open his eyes to some of the real issues that the human rights commission controversy has raised.What's that you say? Why don't I open mine own eyes to the responses that defenders of the commissions are offering? I try, I really do. But when your chief opponent refuses to debate your side of the argument and someone like Kinsella just fawns over this person, it's impossible to have any sympathy.Kinsella finally has his war room under Michael Ignatieff. But these days you could be forgiven for thinking he's working for the Conservatives. The very attacks the Liberals abhor are the ones that Kinsella once used to help take down the Canadian Alliance.
Personally I'd say that he's got all the style, but the substance underneath - well, let's just say ew.

Monday, 24 August, 2009

A Brief Review: The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch


Longtime readers of this blog might have noticed that I kind of have a thing for Philip K. Dick. Not in a sexual, or even a psychosexual way, but in a sort of fan-cultish way that has bordered on unhealthy obsession in the past.


The ultimate irony of this relationship between author ( now long dead ) and reader is that I've read very little of his material. I've read more about him than I've read anything by him.


So I'm going to change that. I've already read and reviewed his book Confessions of a Crap Artist, which is an absolutely brilliant book with a genius behind it that really does need recognition, but that was one of his 'straight' novels. Philip K. Dick was, for most of his career, and despite his best efforts at times, a science fiction writer.


Or rather, he took many of the themes in his straight fiction, and layered science fiction over top of them. The book is the same, just geared toward a different reader, and rather unfettered by such petty things as 'reality' ( which is perfectly fine ).


Now, the latest of his books that I want to review, which I just finished reading late last night, is one of his classics: The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch. Frankly, I don't think that I can even review this book in its entirety after reading it only the once. I think it's the kind of book that you need to read several times, in order to get the different nuances, the different references and themes, out of it.


But I'll do the best that I can for now ( for a more detailed analysis for someone who knows much more than I on the subject, go here ). Here's a brief synopsis, from the back cover ( I don't want to give too much else away; you'll have to read it for yourself ):

Not too long from now, when exiles from a blistering Earth huddle miserably in Martian colonies, the only things that make life bearable are the drugs. Can-D "translates" those who take it into the bodies of Barbie-like dolls. Now there's competition - a substance called Chew-Z marketed under the slogan : "God promises eternal life. We can deliver it." The questions is: What kind of eternity? And who - or what - is the deliverer?

In this wildly disorienting funhouse of a novel, populated by God-like - or perhaps Satanic - takeover artists and corporate psychics, Philip K. Dick explores mysteries that were once the property of S. Paul and Aquinas. His wit, compassion, and knife-edged irony make The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch moving as well as genuinely visionary.


The thing about Philip K. Dick is that, at times, he can be quite an inelegant writer. And at other times, he can have grandiose moments of flowing poetry that almost seem out of place in rather mundane, undeserving situations.

But that's O.K., because viewed as a whole, he was a damned good writer. One of his great strengths is his ability to weave together a varying number of different threads into one, coherent, story - people who you would otherwise think unrelated are related somehow, and while it sometimes takes a little while for these multiple characters - with their corresponding viewpoints - to coalesce and come into coherence, when it happens it really is an impressive spectacle. The Three Stigmata is no exception.

About the only thing that I was disappointed about when reading this book was that the Chew-Z trip, as originally experienced by Leo Bulero, wasn't longer than it was ( this is my own fault, and not PKD's ). But, as I kept reading, of course, and the threads started to come together, I realized that I really had under-estimated the extent of the trip, and as Barney Mayerson went under as well, things really got interesting - although I found that Mayerson's trip was perhaps a bit more revealing, and in-depth than Leo Bulero's. Again, with the threads coming together, I suppose.

The over-arching principle of the book is fascinating in its scope and span. I don't even think that I fully grasped it, and all of its implications - the Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch manifesting themselves in more and more people - which is a good part of why I said that this book merits re-reading to fully grasp all of its nuance and themes.

Needless to say, I highly recommend this book, but with a caveat: you will probably find it confusing and bewildering, to an extent at least. Don't worry - it all comes together in the end; it kind of relies on a bit of faith on the reader's part - but if you're just looking for a kind of fun, space fantasy romp, The Three Stigmata isn't it.

However, if you want an engaging, intriguing, surprising, and bewildering ride, then I would suggest that you read this book. I think it may well be more profound than we might give it credit for after the initial read - superficially, perhaps not, but dig a little deeper and there's plenty of food-for-thought there.

The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch. Check it out.

Oh yeah...

Why didn't I mention this before? Richard Warman is finally being investigated by his current employer, the Department of Defense. Apparently a man who dresses up in Nazi drag and spreads hatred online to trawl for suckers who are stupid enough to get sucked into his lawsuit-heavy web might not be quite DND material.

Who'da thunk'it?

[ ED NOTE: to allegedly trawl for suckers, mind you. ]

BC Greens show support for the HST

Can't say as I'm surprised. From the BC Greens' website: BC Greens Call For Reducing HST To 10%:
Party Supports Combining GST and PST ~ Seeks Debate, Amendment and a Free VoteVictoria, BC – “If BC Greens were in government, we would bring the issue of combining the GST and PST to the Legislature for respectful debate, amendment and a free vote by all MLAs so they could represent the wishes of their constituents’” said Green Party Leader, Jane Sterk.
“Greens actually support combining the GST and PST but we also believe fundamental decisions like this ought to be made in the Legislature not by the Premier.”
In 2004 the Green Party of BC adopted a policy supporting a harmonized sales tax (HST) after consulting with small business organizations that said a harmonized tax would help them reduce costs and make doing business in BC easier. Support for the harmonized collection of the two taxes can be found in Green Book 2009 - 2013.
“We believe reducing red tape is a way for government to stimulate the economy and simplifying taxation systems represents a step in the right direction” Ms. Sterk explained. “We are concerned about the reduced tax exemptions that will result from harmonization.
“The current PST exemptions have rewarded people for buying energy efficient products and that has helped the green industry sector grow. The Green Party would like to see the current Liberal government work with the federal government to provide HST exemptions for products and services related to reducing greenhouse gases. As a governing party, we would have demanded that the HST be used to promote greener technologies.
“Greens think the single tax can reduce the cost of collection and the incidence of double taxation. Currently, some things that people buy include a hidden double tax because companies purchase components on which they pay PST and they have to build that 7% into the price of the final good or service. Not only is that 7% passed on to consumers as part of the price but they are also charged PST on the total. Under tax harmonization, businesses can claim back that first round of PST and reduce costs to consumers.
“We don’t believe Minister Hansen’s claim that the HST will not increase provincial revenues, because new sectors, such as consultants and services industries like accounting, hair dressers, consulting firms of all kinds, and restaurants will have to apply a tax where they have not before. Consumers will bear the brunt of the additional tax on previously exempt goods and services.
“The Green Party of BC calls on the Liberal government to reduce the combined tax to 10%. This would reduce red tape for business and keep the overall tax burden down,” concludes Sterk.


H/t to The Hook.

Interestingly enough, I think the Greens are showing one of the most sensible approaches to this issue to date: take it to the legislature, have a debate, have a vote. As opposed to Campbell's approach: put it through, act surprised when people get angry.

The Federal Reserve Must Die

By Jim Quinn, via TheBurningPlatform.com:
“The Federal Reserve in collaboration with the giant banks has created the greatest financial crisis the world has ever seen. The foolish notion that unlimited amounts of money and credit created out of thin air can provide sustainable economic growth has delivered this crisis to us. Instead of economic growth and stable prices, (The Fed) has given us a system of government and finance that now threatens the world financial and political institutions. Pursuing the same policy of excessive spending, debt expansion and monetary inflation can only compound the problems that prevent the required corrections. Doubling the money supply didn’t work, quadrupling it won’t work either. Buying up the bad debt of privileged institutions and dumping worthless assets on the American people is morally wrong and economically futile.” - Representative from Texas Ron Paul questioning Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke


I’ve read and witnessed various pundits during the Presidential campaign describe Ron Paul as crazy. The corrupt tax and spenders in Congress know their days would be numbered if they followed his vision of government. After reading his tremendously sane rebuke of Ben Bernanke and the policies of his Federal Reserve, I’m reminded of a classic scene from Seinfeld.
Jerry: “Ah, you're crazy." Kramer: "Am I? Or am I so sane that you just blew your mind?!" Jerry: "It's impossible!" Kramer: "Is it? Or is it so possible that your head is spinning like a top?!" Jerry: "It can't be." Kramer: "Can it? Or is your entire world just crashing down all around you?" Jerry: "Alright, that's enough." Kramer: "Yaaaaaaahhh!!!"
Ron Paul’s scathing assessment of the Federal Reserve’s primary role in creating the financial crisis and his raking of Chairman Bernanke over the coals is so accurate, truthful and sane that it should blow your mind. Mr. Bernanke must have felt like his head was spinning like a top while Ron Paul gave him a tutorial in basic economics. Mr. Paul’s noble efforts to Audit the Fed (HR 1207) and eventually to rid the country of its insidious control over our lives will bring the pillars of the Federal Reserve building crashing down upon Mr. Bernanke in his mahogany paneled, gold plated boardroom with ornate chandeliers.

The worldwide financial system experienced a 6.8 magnitude earthquake in September 2008. The very foundations of our economy were shaken to their core. The fear exhibited by government officials, politicians, and the public was palpable and real. For a few weeks there was the distinct possibility that the system would come crashing down. A massive printing of dollars by the Federal Reserve, the clandestine buying up of toxic assets by the Federal Reserve, behind the scenes deals with the biggest banks, covert currency swap deals with foreign Central Banks, and forcing the FASB to change accounting rules to allow banks to fraudulently value bad loans, temporarily staved off the final chapter in the 96 year old diabolical experiment in currency manipulation.
Read the rest here.

The Greens don't need a seat

By Andrew Potter, via the Victoria Times Colonist:
Green party leader Elizabeth May has finally decided to get serious about winning a seat in the Commons, settling on the riding of Saanich-Gulf islands, where in last fall's election the Green candidate came a distant third with only 10.5 per cent of the vote. And she was promptly challenged for the nomination by a member of her own party -- raising the question once again of whether direct-participation electoral politics is really in the interest of the Green movement.
In the introduction to her party's policy platform, May quotes John Kenneth Galbraith, who apparently once said, "All great leaders have had one characteristic in common: it is the willingness to confront unequivocally the major anxiety of their people in their time."
It's clear that the Greens see climate change as the great anxiety of our time, but if they are looking to Galbraith for inspiration, his one-upping of Otto von Bismarck is probably more appropriate: "Politics is not the art of the possible," the late economist wrote. "It consists in choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable."
Democratic politics is not entirely about power, and most people who go into it do so out of a desire to advance some sort of policy agenda. That's why they join political parties, since a party is basically a device for translating policy into power through the marshalling of funds and supporters.
There is no question, though, that mass politics is no place for people who are not keen on compromise, and as a party of self-described idealists, utopians and dreamers, the Green party is more susceptible than most to having its more cherished principles shoved through the wood-chipper of machine politics. Which explains the decision of Stuart Hertzog of Victoria, a Greenpeace activist who has been involved with the Green party since 1983, to challenge May's nomination. In a posting on his blog, Herzog criticized the "tendency towards anti-democratic centralization" in the Green party. He continued: "By desperately trying to become a mainstream political party, Green parties are in danger of losing their vision, and soul."
This fundamental choice, between principle and power, has stalked the Greens since it started acting like a real party in the 2004 election, when it ran candidates in every riding in the country and won 4.3 per cent of the popular vote. But even though its support has since edged up to almost seven per cent of the vote, the Greens have never managed to elect anyone to the House of Commons, something that doesn't appear to have bothered the party's supporters too much. For the past few years, the party has functioned more or less as an environmental lobby group that just happens to run candidates in elections. It sends out an endless stream of press releases, expressing support for this or condemning that, without ever doing much about putting itself in a position to actually influence events in any meaningful way.
Read it here.

Damn you Andrew Potter! That's the column that I wanted to write. Ah well. Next time 'round, it'll be Andrew Potter saying 'Damn you, Walker Morrow!'

Heh. Or not.

Maziar Bahari update

Sent via the Free Maziar Bahari Now! Facebook group:


Update on Maziar's Status: Maziar still detained, day 64

Day 64 of Maziar's detention.The petition, now bearing 8,060 signatures, is being couriered to the Iranian embassy in Ottawa.Please keep on spreading the word: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/free_maziar_bahari/Thank you

Sunday, 23 August, 2009

An interesting new strategy

From Bill Tieleman's latest column:
Last week I wrote that the surest way to block Premier Gordon Campbell and Finance Minister Colin Hansen's HST plan is by recalling enough B.C. Liberal MLAs that they would lose their Legislative majority.But something else could stop the HST -- the B.C. Initiative process.The beauty of an initiative against HSTIt's not foolproof or simple. However, an Initiative can start immediately, while recall can't begin until 18 months after the election.And while recall demands collecting the signatures of 40 per cent of registered voters in that riding during the last election in just 60 days, an initiative is easier.Initiatives require the signatures of just 10 per cent of all registered voters in every one of B.C.'s 85 ridings over 90 days -- much simpler than recall.The problem with the Initiative process is that while the public can force a piece of legislation to be introduced and debated in the Legislature, an Initiative vote could be delayed until September 2011 and there is no obligation on the B.C. Liberal majority to actually pass the bill.However, if enough voters signed up to make the initiative legal under Elections B.C. rules, the B.C. Liberals would be committing political suicide if they refused to introduce it sooner or defeated the No BC HST bill in the Legislature.Rally on September 19What's more, if Campbell and Hansen went ahead despite such a strong public statement that B.C. doesn't want the proposed HST, a recall campaign would be far more likely to meet great success as angry voters lined up to sign a recall petition.The Initiative challenge is clear -- can HST opponents get organized enough in every single riding to obtain the magic 10 per cent of legitimate voter signatures? I say we can!And to kick things off, join myself, former B.C. Premier Bill Vander Zalm and other political and community leaders at a NO BC HST rally on Saturday September 19 at 12 noon outside the Vancouver Art Gallery.
Read it here.

Canadian journalist's year in hell

By Ben Rayner, via the Toronto Star:
As anniversaries go, it's a bleak one – and only Amanda Lindhout herself truly knows how bleak.
It was one year ago today that the Alberta-bred journalist and two colleagues were kidnapped at gunpoint in Somalia, plucked from a road near Mogadishu.
Since then, little has been seen or heard of the 28-year-old Sylvan Lake native, aside from a mute video of her and Australian reporter Nigel Brennan kneeling before their masked and armed captors aired on Al-Jazeera television weeks after they disappeared, and a few scattered, horrifying calls to media outlets by a distraught woman claiming to be Amanda Lindhout in recent months in which she essentially pleads with the Canadian government to save her life.
The last was made to Omni TV three weeks ago: "I don't want to die here and I'm afraid I'll die in captivity if I don't get help soon," she sobbed, saying she was kept in shackles in a windowless room and suffering from fever, dysentery and an abscessed tooth. "I don't know how much longer I can bear this."
Just days before, the Somali news site
Waagacusub.com furthered long-circulating rumours of rape by reporting that Lindhout had given birth to a baby boy and was "very contented with her marriage relationship with one of her captors."
It has also been reported that Lindhout has escaped at least twice, only to be recaptured.
She and Brennan are being held for a ransom initially set at $2.5 million (U.S.), but reportedly reduced to several other sums since. One of the journalists captured with her, a Somali, was released in January.
Lindhout's father, John, and her mother, Lorinda Stewart, have been silent, likely for fear of upsetting fragile negotiations. But on Friday, they offered a statement with the Brennan family through Reporters Without Borders.
"Together, the two families continue to work tirelessly to secure Nigel's and Amanda's safe release," it read.
"With little outside support, the families, who have been united as one throughout this horrendous ordeal, continue to do everything and anything to gain the earliest possible release for their loved ones Amanda and Nigel. Our thoughts and all our love are with Amanda and Nigel today, just as they have been for the past 365 days, and just as they will be until they are safely home with us."
If the government has made any progress towards bringing Lindhout home, it's keeping mum.
Read the rest here.

No-longer-anonymous Anonymously trenchant commentator plans to sue over her non-anonymity

Geez.

By George Rush, via the New York Daily News: Outed blogger Rosemary Port blames model Liskula Cohen for 'skank' stink :


Sorry seems to be the hardest word for the blogger who anonymously scorned a model as a "ho" and a "skank," igniting a legal and media maelstrom.
Speaking out for the first time since a court order forced
Google to reveal her identity, blogger Rosemary Port tells the Daily News that model Liskula Cohen should blame herself for the uproar.
"This has become a public spectacle and a circus that is not my doing," said Port, whose "Skanks in
NYC" site branded the 37-year-old Cohen an "old hag."
"By going to the press, she defamed herself," Port said.
"Before her suit, there were probably two hits on my Web site: One from me looking at it, and one from her looking at it," Port said. "That was before it became a spectacle. I feel my right to privacy has been violated."
The pretty 29-year-old
Fashion Institute of Technology student added that she's furious at Google for revealing her identity, so much so that she plans to file a $15 million federal lawsuit against the Web giant.
"When I was being defended by attorneys for Google, I thought my right to privacy was being protected," Port said.
"But that right fell through the cracks. Without any warning, I was put on a silver platter for the press to attack me. I would think that a multi-billion dollar conglomerate would protect the rights of all its users."

Read the rest here.

Yes, it totally ruins the fun of insulting someone when you're held to task for your own words. That's why anonymity in the past has been used by otherwise respectible people to say particularly outrageous things.

But here's the thing. In the past, you could get away with that unless somebody who knew, blabbed. These days, when you're using free blogging software courtousy of Google, and calling people names under the guise of a pseudonymn, it's pretty damned easy to get unmasked.

And generally, I consider it to be kind of an insult whenever somebody's real-life info is brought into things when they don't want it to be. For instance, Warren Kinsella's outing of the blogger Blazing Cat Fur was, frankly, rather pathetic.

But in this case, I think I'll make an exception. There's no human right to privacy. Only an expectation borne from our freedom to act. And when somebody pokes a bubble into that privacy, especially when you've been using it to lob pot-shots at some model that is, frankly, prettier than you, then it's rather childish to go stamping about shaking your fists in the air and crying about how your 'human right' to call somebody a poop-head behind the veil of anonymity has been violated.

Grow up.

But - while I have no sympathy for this no-longer-anonymous blogger, I do have to admit that it's a bit worrying that somebody's private info can just be turned over on a court order over, well, hurt feelings.

In a way, I think everybody's acting rather pettily here, and nobody wins, except, I guess, the lawyers and the courts involved who have succeeded in further cementing libel chill and the invasion of privacy by an extension of the government.

[ UPDATE: more on this from the Globe and Mail, with some interesting commentary from Kate at Small Dead Animals. ]

[ UPDATE 2: I got an interesting comment on this story from Michael Roberts, who deals with this sort of thing all the time:


Nice post Walker. I must say however that the problem is probably a little bit more serious than most realize. I often use the analogy of a farmer who has all his livestock destroyed and barns and feels burned. The calamity to his livelihood is just as real, though maybe not as tangible, as a white collar consultant or other intangible service provider who has been maliciously and deceptively maligned by a cowardly anonymous blogger.Respectfully submitted, Michael Roberts. Internet libel victim's advocate and anonymous blogger headhunter.Www.Rexxfield.com
Now, if you check out the site that he links to, Rexxfield.com, this is what he does, listed under Services:


Identifying Anonymous Bloggers
Anonymous free speech is not an absolute privilege. If someone maligns you, you have a right to discover their identity. Rexxfield can help.
more....
Personal Online Reputation Restoration
For professionals, academics and business people who need an impeccable reputation to survive.
Personal Reputation Plan


Investigations and Litigation Assistance
A significant portion of Rexxfield's resources is dedicated to assisting litigation teams seeking injunctive and equitable relief from libel for their clients. In most cases Rexxfield can positively identify the offenders with relatively little time and expense. Some of our team members literally "wrote the book" on IT security and digital forensics courses and examinations adopted by government, military and corporate clients globally.
more....


Online Allegations of Healthcare & Medical Malpractice
About 20% of Rexxfield's inquiries come from the healthcare industry. We have encountered horror stories of patients who refuse to comply with post-op instructions and prescribed treatments and yet publicly vilify the attending physicians, nurses and institutions for the resulting complications.
Medical Reputation Defense

To be honest, that sounds like kind of a cool job. I tend to be a bit leery when it comes to libel and defamation cases being brought to court - I'm fine with civil lawsuits over such things, I just tend to draw the line at actual, legal punishments for libel or defamation.

But at the same time, I kind of like the idea of having some of the Internet's more scummy denizens tracked down, unmasked, and laid bare. Sounds good, quite frankly. As I've said before, Anonymity isn't a right, it's more of a privilege than anything else, borne of our expectation to freedom of movement. But that's just it: it's an expectation, and nothing else. ]

Dipper picks on docs

By Ian Robinson, via the Calgary Sun:
Let's say you're a rational human being.
Now forget everything you know to be true, indulge all your social and class resentments against people who are smarter, better educated and more successful than you are and get a bottle of Wild Turkey down your gullet to disable every single one of your higher brain functions.
That's right. I want you to pretend to be a socialist.
Like former NDP MLA David Eggen, Alberta executive director of Friends of Medicare.
Or, as I like to think of them: Economically illiterate nutcases who lobby to ensure our grandparents live month after month in agony because their hip replacement surgery got postponed and they didn't have the bucks to fly to the U.S. to have it done promptly.
I guess they don't go with the latter because it won't fit on their business cards.
Eggen recently came out in full-throated whine against the notion doctors be paid really well to combat an influenza pandemic.
There are a couple of things you should know about Eggen.
One: He's a schoolteacher by trade and therefore has spent his entire life insulated from the harsh realities most of us take for granted while competing in the market-based economy.
Two: He won a seat as an MLA in Edmonton as a New Democrat only to be defeated by Tory Doug Elniski.
This is not like being one of the boxers beaten by Muhammad Ali or Mike Tyson. This is like being one of the boxers beaten by Peter McNeeley.
Eggen has since surfaced as boss of an organization that doesn't understand that health-care professionals are free human beings and not mere vassals of the socialist slave state, and that competition is a good idea to improve efficiency in the delivery of goods and services.
Despite how you feel about recent market ups and downs, face it: Capitalism gave us the Porsche 911, the Mustang and the Charger. Socialism gave us the Lada, the Trabant and the Dacia.
The Alberta Medical Association -- which negotiates fees for doctors from the government parently wants the province to agree to pay docs a little better than $500 an hour to work with victims of the coming swine flu pandemic in the middle of the night; $260 during the day, all at a time when one-in-four doctors will be ill themselves.
The notion of a wild-eyed socialist criticizing the process whereby the proletariat (doctors) band together to stick it to the man (the province) in terms of wages rather boggles the imagination.
Read the rest here.

Elizabeth May: time to bring the pain

Or not. Apparently, Elizabeth May is such an inspirational leader that even her fellow Greenoids are running against her. From Pundit's Guide:

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May is being challenged by a member of her own party for the nomination in her chosen riding of Saanich – Gulf Islands, BC.May will have to deal with newly-declared candidate Stuart Hertzog of Victoria, a Greenpeace activist who has been involved with the Green Party in Alberta and British Columbia since 1983, and who is the publisher of the website GreenPolitics.ca.In a blogpost published late yesterday entitled "Why I am standing as a nomination candidate", Hertzog says he became involved in grassroots activism because "Secret decisions were made behind closed doors, in cabinet or at private meetings with corporate CEOs and lobbyists," that could only be fought by winning the war for public opinion. However, unfortunately he has seen that "the same tendency towards anti-democratic centralisation has become dominant in Canada’s Green parties".Hertzog says he disagrees with the decision of the Green Party of Canada's Federal Council to make electing the leader its overarching priority, saying that:


"[T]he ‘leader’ of a Green Party is supposed to be a spokesperson, not a dictator. The cult of leadership and its promotion by the corporate media is not Green. I believe that getting the leader of the Green Party elected won’t change anything, except to guarantee the flow of funds to central party coffers and reduce the Green party to being seen as just another bunch of untrustworthy politicians that make self-serving deals....""By desperately trying to become a mainstream political party, Green parties are in danger of losing their vision, and soul. It has been said that: 'Without vision, the people perish.' I say that without principles, politics is an empty charade....""Parachuting the leader of the Green Party into a foreign bioregion and pouring in the money, will not change Canadian politics by one iota.""This is why I am standing as a nomination candidate for Saanich-Gulf Islands, in my Island bioregion."

In my experience, it is unprecedented for the leader of a major political party to be challenged for the nomination in their chosen seat by a member of their own party. Perhaps any reader with a previous example of this could add it to the comment section below, and refresh our memories.But the move strikes me as particularly significant because it comes from the left of the Green Party (Hertzog once worked within the Green Caucus of the BC NDP and ran under that banner in 1991), whereas May's most public critics to date have emerged from the right of the party.And have no doubt, Saanich – Gulf Islands *is* May's chosen riding; the announcement of that decision, scheduled for September 8 in the campaign office already rented for her, is a mere formality by this point, and already widely known on the ground out there and elsewhere.

Read it all here.

Now, this suggest two things to me. First of all, I think this actually serves as a testament to the structure of the Green Party as it has branded itself over the years: a de-centralized political movement...that just happens to have a leader...with no particular aims of political power.

Of course, this message has changed, or Lizzie May has been trying to change it, in a bid to get into parliament. The rest of the party just hasn't gotten the message yet.

Second, I wonder if this fellow Hurtzog realizes the party that he's running for, and the leader that he's running under. The Elizabeth May Greens are a politically activist movement, with the political part added on to masque their rather long list of demands with a somewhat-acceptable veneer of democratic process. Time and again, Elizabeth May has shown herself only too willing to throw the 'ideals' of the Green Party under Da Bus in favor of realizing aforementioned list of demands; that this behavior makes a mockery of her demands for the party to be involved in the electoral process apparently doesn't matter to her, or if it does, it's not enough to get her to stick to her political guns.

Or perhaps Stuart Hurtzog's stand for independence in politics is the result of his realizing these exact things, and he is truly representative of what many members of the Green Party would like it to be. If so, then I truly wish him luck, although in the sense that I at least respect him for standing up for what he believes in; I suspect that we would disagree so radically politically as to make anything else just an exercise in antagonism.

[ UPDATE: more on this at the National Post's Full Comment. ]

Saturday, 22 August, 2009

The Weekly Mark Madness

Links Steynian:

Anchor Rising

Ask For The Old Roads

Five Feet Of Fury

Empire Burlesque

Crunchy Con

Liberalguy

Kathy Shaidle

Progressive Alaska

Freedom's Lighthouse

Conservatives 4 Palin

The Washington Monthly

The Lynch Mob

Dr. Roy's Thoughts

Atlantic Free Press

Glenn Greenwald

Media Matters For America, with more here, and here.

Pushmybuttons

The Black Kettle

A Reading Life

The South Florida Daily Blog, with more here.

Vocal Minority

7.62mm Justice

KXNet.com North Dakota News

No Apologies

Dagblog.com

Jim Nichols

TribStar.com

Eats, Blogs and Leaves, with more here, and here.

Uruknet.info

The Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel

BizzyBlog

Northern Tequila

David Olive

CheBama

Small Dead Animals

The Other McCain

The Kraalspace

Ghost of a Flea

NC Media Watch

Truth And Common Sense

Stand Like a Rock

Bookworm Room

Instapundit

MariettaTimes.com

Content Steynian

In NRO's The Corner:

Stimulus in a nutshell

Okay, You Don't Like the Term 'Death Panels' . . .

Hot New Cyber-Talent Flees Blogosphere!

You'll Feel Like a Kid Again

The ten-month wait for the maternity ward (cont)

HUAC (The Healthcare UnAmerican Activities Committee)

Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death Panels

Embrace Me, My Sweet Embraceable Mo

Why Cut off the Foot . . .

Re: Big Pharma Swallows Obama's Pill

Yet More Nothing to See Here

The Ultimate Outsourcing

Pushing up Heather

Mark's song of the week: As Time Goes By

In the National Review and the OC Register: Stimulus hits a pothole

Mark's request of the week: The Business of Government

In Macleans: What made Budd Schulberg run

On books: Talking Immigration

On the Hugh Hewitt show: Mark Steyn's MST3K of Newsweeks' podcast

On stage and screen: The Biggest Star

Guest-hosting the Rush Limbaugh show: August 18th

On America: Untangling the Spaghetti

On stage and screen: Brain-Acting

On the Hugh Hewitt show: on Obama administration gaffes here and abroad, and cartoon sensitivity

On America: See You In The Database

On the world: Timiditas Et Deditio

In the National Review, the Jewish World Review, and the OC Register: Unplugging Grandma isn't the problem

Mark's request of the ( different ) week: Old-School Copper

On Britain and Europe: Yet More Nothing To See Here

In Macleans: We can’t talk about immigration

On Canada and the Commonwealth: The Ultimate Outsourcing

In Mark's blog:

Forty shades of taxpayer green...

Jennifer Lynch: Please send reinforcements!

Plus, more links Steynian, Levantian, and Freespeechian over at Free Canuckistan.

Friday, 21 August, 2009

Mohamed Elmasry continues his long line of intelligent comparisons

As in, Islamic slavery was far superior to Christian slavery. Jonathan Kay writes, for Full Comment:

This just in from former Canadian Islamic Congress chief Mohamed Elmasry: Islamic slavery wasn't all that bad.
Writing in
The Canadian Charger — a newly formed internet-based grab bag of anti-Western articles published by hard left Canadian activists — Elmasry works hard to distinguish the evils of Christian slavery from the purportedly enlightened race-mixing that resulted from its Islamic equivalent.
Some snippets: "Islam, with no church, teaches that all humans, irrespective of their gender, skin color, and ethnic origin are capable of doing good; there is no original sin. The One God is the Lord of all, not of special people or tribe … Islam and Africa have made something of each other that is quite extraordinary … Islam teaches that slaves, who were then the result of wars, Africans or not, should be treated well and set free as soon as possible … Islam also teaches that slaves can buy their freedom in-kind. Thus many of them excelled to be teachers and even scholars … Islam teaches a slave is a victim of circumstances who should be helped to be free and treated fairly in the mean time. Trading in slaves is a sin. This is in contrast to the teachings of the Bible, 'Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling.' … The Arab Muslims called Africans Zanji (hence the island of Zanjibar or Zanzibar), Habashi (from Habasha, Arabic for Ethiopian) or Sudani (Arabic for black). Such names “were not derogatory but simply ethnographic … Some [slaves] achieved high rank and status …" And so on.
The basic theme is that Islamic slavery — to the extent it was bad at all (and it's not really clear that Elmasry thinks it was) — was an enlightened, almost consensual, win-win exercise in regional multiculturalism. In his characteristically absurd elevation of Islam over Christianity, he makes no mention of the fact that religious Christians led the abolition movement in the West — while slavery persisted wholesale in the Arab world until late in the 20th century, and still survives in parts of Islamic Africa, including Sudan. Indeed, one wonders what the Christian tribespeople from southern Sudan who have been abducted, forcibly converted to Islam, and enslaved by Arab Muslims in recent years would make of Elmasry's historical fantasies.
It's amazing, isn't it? Our Christian leaders seem to do nothing but
apologize these days — for every historical sin under the sun. But here you have a man who recently led the most prominent Muslim activist group in Canada, and he thinks it's just dandy that his Arab forebears colonized and enslaved great swathes of Africa over the course of many centuries — a colonial situation that essentially persists in Sudan and regions of the Maghreb.
Interestingly enough, while reading A.J. Jacob's super coolio The Year of Living Biblically, I ran across the theory that Christian slavery was actually a fairly lenient form of the practice - or at least, superior to that practiced by neighboring cultures. That's undoubtedly a white-washed view, but I think it's food for thought.

However, Elmasry's analysis falls short far sooner than Biblical times, as Jonathan Kay pointed out. There's no point in arguing the leniency of your religion in the past when it is committing barbaric acts in the present.

Shameless

Kelly McParland, for the National Post's Full Comment, writes on the Campbell government's rather interesting increase in deficit allowances over the years:

Prior to the 2009 budget, they promised there would be no deficit:


"In British Columbia there is legislation that says deficits are illegal. So I will be bringing down on Feb. 17 a balanced budget." Colin Hansen Vancouver Sun, Dec. 6, 2008


Then they promised a small deficit of two years only:

"It will be necessary to run a temporary deficit, for the next two years only. By the third year, we will once again be back, enjoying balanced budgets." Colin Hansen, The Province, Feb. 3, 2009

They attacked Carole James for predicting the need for longer deficits


"NDP's Spending Plan Will Break Balanced Budget Law." B.C. Liberal Caucus news release, March 4, 2009
"NDP Plan to Scrap Balanced Budget Law -- The NDP have revealed their reckless and irresponsible plan to plunge B.C. into years of massive deficits and scrap the law requiring a balanced budget by 2011." Liberal Party website, March 6, 2009


They promised the deficit would be small:


"The deficit for 2009-10 will be $495 million maximum." Gordon Campbell, Vancouver Sun, April 24, 2009
"If I were in a position to table a budget today it would be a deficit of $495 million or less... I am still confident that come Sept. 1 we will be able to deliver on that." Colin Hansen, Vancouver Sun, June 11, 2009.

Then they admitted the deficits wouldn't be small


"The old summer switcheroo continued yesterday from the Gordon Campbell government. Another day, another bit of election doubletalk gets exposed as a sham. This time this is a big one: the deficit. The bottom line, the deficit is out of control in British Columbia." Michael Smyth, CKNW, Aug. 20, 2009


And now it's all out the window:


"Another stunning economic announcement from Finance Minister Colin Hansen today. Hansen says B.C. cannot return to surplus budgets in three years as planned so he will introduce amendments in the legislature next week that will allow the government to table deficit budgets for an extra two years." CKNW, Aug. 20, 2009

Throughout the entire mess, the only thing the B.C. Liberals have consistently done is ignore all the warning signs. Even back in February leading economist Helmut Pastrick predicted a much larger deficit, but the Liberals dismissed him as "pessimistic". And they accused Carole James of "fear mongering" every time the New Democrats warned that B.C. Liberal revenue projections were out of touch with reality.

Umm....yeah. There's not much you can say to that. I will, however, point out that there is some speculation that the current BC deficit could be as high as 2.5 billion. From Public Eye Online:
Yesterday, Finance Minister Colin Hansen told reporters provincial government revenues have eroded by more than $2 billion since June. But, as reported by The Times Colonist's Rob Shaw, "It's unclear what that means for the provincial deficit. Hansen has said the deficit will be 'significantly' larger than the $495 million promised in the February budget. He offered no updated figure yesterday." But could it be that figure is $2.5 billion or higher? Perhaps it could even be around $2.8 billion? And could it also be the government will soon announce that figure?

Federal taxman gets caught with pants down in battle against ex-stripper

By Sidhartha Banerjee, via Yahoo News:
MONTREAL - In a legal showdown against a tax-wary former stripper, it's the Canada Revenue Agency that's been caught with its pants down.
The legal saga over $2 million in undeclared revenue began in storybook fashion at Chez Paree - a pricey Montreal strip club patronized over the years by scores of wealthy executives and visiting athletes, including some very prominent hockey Hall of Famers.
Martine Landry was a dancer at the Montreal institution and was particularly popular with one rich, elderly customer who struck up a relationship with her.
He showered her with gifts over the years worth about $2 million: a Corvette, money to buy a BMW, eight fur coats, jewels, a vacation, cash to buy a big downtown bar and get out of the dancing business, and $168,000 in $1,000 bills for a down payment on a house.
According to a judgment rendered by the Tax Court of Canada, the mystery benefactor, named in court documents as Mr. X, paid Landry largely to keep him company, not to dance.
Montreal's La Presse newspaper identified the man Thursday as Marc-Aime Guerin, owner of a Quebec company that specializes in publishing textbooks.
Landry in turn recounted that she was attracted to his vast knowledge of all things and, over time, the publishing-industry magnate, now 80, began to introduce her to a world she knew nothing of.
What blossomed was an 11-year relationship that quickly took on - according to Landry's court testimony - a "father-daughter" dynamic.
Landry would often accompany her benefactor to the Montreal casino, where he would give her the winnings to deposit in her account.
But eventually her low income statements and sky-high living expenses raised alarm bells at the federal revenue agency.
By this time, Landry had long quit dancing and was the owner of the popular Montreal watering hole Guerin had helped her acquire.
A net-worth audit showed a major discrepancy between revenues evaluated against assets and outgoing expenses, the difference being subject to taxes unless she could prove where the money came from.
And like many Canadians, Landry had a difference of opinion with the federal taxman about how much money she actually owed.
The feds demanded $602,617 in taxes and penalties for the years 1998 to 2002.


Read the rest here.

Thursday, 20 August, 2009

Live-book-blogging

The resident Philip K. Dick scholar at Total Dick-Head is currently live-blogging his way through PKD's book A Maze of Death, as a part of Total Dick-Head's summer reading club.

Check it out: parts one, two, and three.

Popcorn is a health food, says research

By Richard Alleyne, via the Calgary Herald:
It has been the guilty treat enjoyed by cinema-goers for generations.
But now, American scientists have discovered that popcorn contains the same amount of healthy antioxidants as fruit and vegetables, because it is a whole-grain food.
Such foods are made using grains that have not been refined to remove the bran and germ, and are known to bring health benefits because of the fibre in them.
Scientists are reassessing their effectiveness and think it might be polyphenols, which act as antioxidants by removing damaging free radicals from the body, that are the main health-giving ingredient.
"Early researchers thought that the fibre was the active ingredient for benefits in whole grains, the reason why they may reduce the risk of cancer and coronary heart disease," said Joe Vinson, who led the study at the University of Scranton, Penn.
"Recently, polyphenols emerged as potentially more important.
"(In popcorn), you get all the wonderful ingredients of the corn undiluted and protected by the skin. In my opinion it's a good health food."
Read it here.

Coolio.