Friday, November 20, 2009
My latest for Heartless and Brainless
Here we are. I've posted a couple of things up on the Heartless and Brainless blog, although whether for your, their, or my own edification and enjoyment, I don't know.
Anyway, first off: ACORN the new media?; in which I talk about ACORN, media scapegoats, and Doug Hoffman.
Also: While I'm at it: something for McGill alumni, in which I talk about, well, McGill alumni. What else?
Anyway, first off: ACORN the new media?; in which I talk about ACORN, media scapegoats, and Doug Hoffman.
Also: While I'm at it: something for McGill alumni, in which I talk about, well, McGill alumni. What else?
Uh oh
This doesn't look good:
I might be surprised if it wasn't BC.
H/t Public Eye Reads.
I might be surprised if it wasn't BC.
H/t Public Eye Reads.
Making things difficult
From The Hook:
Many critics fear the 2010 Games will smother free speech. But a rapid proliferation of cell-phone cameras and open-source websites could make potential restrictions hard to enforce, a UBC journalism professor said Thursday evening.Heh. That's what we're here for.
“We’ve had this weird thing happen where the eyes of big brother are sort of turned around,” Daniel W. Burnett told a forum on the 2010 Games and civil liberties.
Warren Kinsella's gone
It's all over, folks. Warren Kinsella isn't leading the Liberal war-room anymore. And I don't know whether to be happy or sad. From Warren's blog:
Ezra Levant, of course, is all over this, and with a rather gloomy prediction:
Over the course of that year-and-a-week, I've spent a lot of time working with some amazing, amazing people on Michael's leadership campaign and, very soon thereafter, the Liberal election readiness team. It was, and is, a kick-ass team. But the Fall 2009 election that we'd been getting ready for wasn't to be. Sigh. It's now looking like it'll be next Spring, or next Fall, or maybe even the Spring after that (though I doubt it).My focus, and this wee website's, will therefore turn more to municipal and provincial politics - and punk rock, and hockey rink philosophy, and the law, and bad puns, and clumsy alliterations, and the other stuff I like.I'll continue to knock around the Reformatories, of course, as they never seem to stop providing material - here and here, just in this week alone - but not 24/7, as I've been doing since I signed on to Iggy's team.Read it here.
Ezra Levant, of course, is all over this, and with a rather gloomy prediction:
When Ignatieff hired Kinsella, the Liberals were essentially tied with the Conservatives. On the day Donolo fired Kinsella, the Liberals are 15% behind. I call it the Kinsella Effect; Donolo calls it time to end amateur hour, and bring in some grown-ups.I can't help but agree. Warren Kinsella's antics have been one of the longest-running series of gaffes to plague the Liberal Party since Iggy got into the game. Now what are we going to make fun of?
Though I'm a Conservative booster, I've got to be candid: I predict that with Kinsella gone, Ignatieff will begin to close that 15-point gap.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
A very Keith Martin update
You remember Keith Martin, right? He's the MP - Liberal - for Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca, who raised a private member's motion against Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. He was one of the first politicians in Canada to take a stand on the issue.
Well, that was a long time ago, and so I was a little curious about the status of that particular PMM ( by the way, you should see a button for it on my sidebar to the right ). So I sent a message to Keith Martin on Facebook and asked him about it. Here's what I wrote:
So, some rainy day, M-446 might just be the next bit of HRC-related excitement.
Well, that was a long time ago, and so I was a little curious about the status of that particular PMM ( by the way, you should see a button for it on my sidebar to the right ). So I sent a message to Keith Martin on Facebook and asked him about it. Here's what I wrote:
Hi Keith,And...was it yesterday? The days blur together sometimes...I got an answer from - presumably - someone in his office:
I know this is kind of a dumb question, but I was just wondering: what is the status of the Private Member's Motion - M-446 - that you had raised? Did it ever see the light of day, or is it still buried amongst the other PMMs?
Either way, kudos to you for raising it, and for your principled stand for freedom of speech in Canada.
Cheers!
-Walker
Walker, the motion itself has not come up for a vote, but there has been a lot of progress on the file. Thanks to the motion and the resulting media attention, Section 13 of the HR Act has been reviewd by a HOC committee and even the head of the HRC has said that it is flawed.
Thanks for your kind words - I'll pass your note along to Keith
-Jeff
So, some rainy day, M-446 might just be the next bit of HRC-related excitement.
Sad that it's come to this
Chantal Hebert had a good article for the Toronto Star on the brand spankin' new Citizenship guide. She had a lot of good to say about it, but one line that struck me was this one:
How bad have things become over the course of the past fifteen years that we now have to warn new citizens that genital mutilation and spousal abuse are off the table?
The booklet warns that "barbaric cultural practices that tolerate spousal abuse, `honour killings,' female genital mutilation, or other gender-based violence" are punishable crimes in this country. In the more innocent Canada of 1995, such an admonition would have been unthinkable.
How bad have things become over the course of the past fifteen years that we now have to warn new citizens that genital mutilation and spousal abuse are off the table?
Warren Kinsella flies into a predictable rage
Warren's all up in a tizzy. Why? Well, apparently he doesn't like the Ignatieff Libs' non-anti-semitism being called into question by the CPC. Fair enough, I suppose, but rather odd considering that back before the Ignatieff days Warren was saying much the same thing.
Even odder that he can remember enough to quote from one of his books, but not enough to quote from his own blog on a subject that seems very near and dear to his heart. Ah well. That's why we have Alberta Aardvark, to give the occasional reminder. Thanks to Jay Currie for bringing this to my attention.
Meanwhile, Ezra Levant does that thing that he does so well: Is Michael Ignatieff an anti-Semite? Shorter answer: no, but he's still said some off-key things about Israel - don't take my word for it though; read the post yourself.
By the way, if Warren and co. think the CPC mail-out was bad, wait until they get a load of this...
Oh - while I'm on this topic, I came across this article today in the Tyee, from Murray Dobbin: Criticizing Israel Isn't Antisemitism. I coughed a little bit through the description of Jason Kenney's apparent excesses regarding George Galloway and the Canadian Arab Federation, but I think the article's still worth a read.
[ UPDATE: More from Blazing Cat Fur. ]
Even odder that he can remember enough to quote from one of his books, but not enough to quote from his own blog on a subject that seems very near and dear to his heart. Ah well. That's why we have Alberta Aardvark, to give the occasional reminder. Thanks to Jay Currie for bringing this to my attention.
Meanwhile, Ezra Levant does that thing that he does so well: Is Michael Ignatieff an anti-Semite? Shorter answer: no, but he's still said some off-key things about Israel - don't take my word for it though; read the post yourself.
By the way, if Warren and co. think the CPC mail-out was bad, wait until they get a load of this...
Oh - while I'm on this topic, I came across this article today in the Tyee, from Murray Dobbin: Criticizing Israel Isn't Antisemitism. I coughed a little bit through the description of Jason Kenney's apparent excesses regarding George Galloway and the Canadian Arab Federation, but I think the article's still worth a read.
[ UPDATE: More from Blazing Cat Fur. ]
The Olympics and homeless, continued
From Public Eye Online:
Read the rest here.
Yes, well we all know how good the Campbell Libs have been about keeping their promises, now don't we?
On a related note, Monte Paulsen recently had an excellent article up at The Tyee: Welcome to the 'Burbs, Meet the New Homeless.
A confidential government document obtained by Public Eye states BC Housing will use "Extreme Weather response protocols" to deal with the "higher number of homeless persons requiring assistance" during Vancouver's 2010 Winter Olympic Games.
Those protocols open up around 600 temporary shelter spaces in Metro Vancouver.
But they will also allow police to use a soon-to-be granted power that will let them forcibly take homeless people to a shelter.
In an interview with Public Eye, Pivot Legal Society lawyer Laura Track said, "If the plan is to use the extreme weather protocol to open up more beds during the Olympics, the corollary is that during the Olympics the police will have the ability to use force to take people off the streets."
But Housing and Social Minister Rich Coleman said the government won't be abusing those protocols, stressing they'll only be used if the conditions triggering them actually exist.
"If there's no extreme weather during the Olympics, no protocol gets activated," he promised.
Read the rest here.
Yes, well we all know how good the Campbell Libs have been about keeping their promises, now don't we?
On a related note, Monte Paulsen recently had an excellent article up at The Tyee: Welcome to the 'Burbs, Meet the New Homeless.
An eggo shortage?
From CTV.ca:
And I'm afraid that's just the beginning. I'm picturing like, 28 Days Later-type anarchy due to the shortage. It could be that the Eggo in our systems has been what is keeping us calm all this time.Leggo my Eggo! No, seriously, there's a shortage
[...]
Kellogg Co. says there will be a nationwide shortage of its popular Eggo frozen waffles until next summer because of interruptions in production at two of the four plants that make them.
The company's Atlanta plant was shut down for an undisclosed period by a September storm that dumped historic amounts of rain in the area.
Meanwhile, several production lines at its largest bakery in Rossville, Tenn. are closed indefinitely for repairs.
Company spokeswoman Kris Charles says it will take until the middle of 2010 before shelves around the country are stocked at pre-shutdown levels.
Already customers are noticing near-empty Eggo shelves on the freezer aisle at many grocery stores. They are lamenting the shortage on blogs, Twitter and Facebook.
A tempest in a fat joke
The War on Twitter rages on, it seems, as Charlie 'Draconian' Angus defends his call for a Twitter black-out during committee meetings:
Kady O’Malley calls me draconian. The National Post says I’m a luddite. It’s all over my comments that MP twitter posts lie between the banal and the inane. Have no fear national media — your ability to read what Carolyn Bennett eats for breakfast will not be shut down. I only wish I could have gotten this national uproar over the crisis being faced by children in Attawapiskat who are sleeping in tents tonight.Geez, and to think that this all started with one lousy fat joke. I miss the good ol' days when we were talking about communion wafers.
Voting has begun
The voting has begun for the Infidel Blogger Awards, so head on over and cast your ballot. And hey, if you feel like it, throw a vote or two my way, huh?
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
I ain't no charity case, but...
Dear readers,
There's one question that faces most, if not all bloggers when they first get started: am I doing this for cash, or for the love of what I'm doing?
Now, blogging simply won't work if you're doing it for money. That's just a fact. If you're going to set up the readership, the sponsorships and the ads and the buttons and whathaveyou, at some point you're going to actually have to put together content. And unless you're special somehow, you're going to have to actually enjoy blogging in order to be able to commit to it for that much. And so, the love comes first and hopefully the cash comes second, if that's the route that you want to go.
When I was first getting started blogging ( listen to me, I sound like I'm some kind of old hat at this; I've only been blogging for a couple of years - but I blog hard ), I decided that I wasn't going to try and sell adspace, use Google Ads, or any of that jazz. No disrespect to the bloggers who decide to go that route, but I just figure that there are enough ads out there already. And quite frankly, I don't want to ruin what this blog is for, which is something unique, and tied in to me. This blog is my adspace. It's where I get to vent and talk about all the daily crap that I can't talk about anywhere else. And, hopefully, all that ventin' and talkin' is edifying to someone out there - or at the least, entertaining. But even if it weren't, I'd probably still be doing it ( although admittedly, probably less ).
And so I am not, nor will I ever sell advertising, on this blog or any other that I run. However, tonight I did put together what I hope will be a happy medium:
If you look to the right, you should see, amongst all the other lists and buttons and whatnot, a PayPal button. My tip-jar, if you will. Now, I'm not begging for cash or anything. Frankly there are better things for you to spend your money on.
But you know what? I've spent a lot of time on this site. I'm approaching four thousand posts over the past two years - well, a little over; the BoW turned 2 last October. Four thousand posts. Now, not all of these posts have been verbose, witty bits of prose, granted. In fact, a lot of them are just quick updates, or re-posts and mentions of pictures and videos and other peoples' articles. And when I look at some of the first posts that I put up on this site ( which are still available if you want a laugh ), it's almost damned painful to read them. But that's still a lot of time, day after day, week after week, month after month, and now, year after year. I've put effort into this blog, and energy. When I haven't felt like it, I've blogged, and when I should have been doing other things, I did this instead.
I'm not saying all of this to say that I deserve your money. There are plenty of bloggers who have worked just as hard, if not harder, than I have who deserve your funds more.
But what I am saying is that, if you feel like it, and you want to chip a few bucks my way, it'd be much appreciated. Writers don't make a lot of money, and I'm no exception. Every dollar helps. But more than money, it'd be a sign that those near-four thousand posts over the past two years haven't gone totally un-noticed.
The Blog of Walker is free, and always will be, and I promise you, the reader, that you'll never see one ad on this site. But, if you feel like showing a token of appreciation, I'd just like to draw your attention to the PayPal button on the right.
Cheers,
Walker
There's one question that faces most, if not all bloggers when they first get started: am I doing this for cash, or for the love of what I'm doing?
Now, blogging simply won't work if you're doing it for money. That's just a fact. If you're going to set up the readership, the sponsorships and the ads and the buttons and whathaveyou, at some point you're going to actually have to put together content. And unless you're special somehow, you're going to have to actually enjoy blogging in order to be able to commit to it for that much. And so, the love comes first and hopefully the cash comes second, if that's the route that you want to go.
When I was first getting started blogging ( listen to me, I sound like I'm some kind of old hat at this; I've only been blogging for a couple of years - but I blog hard ), I decided that I wasn't going to try and sell adspace, use Google Ads, or any of that jazz. No disrespect to the bloggers who decide to go that route, but I just figure that there are enough ads out there already. And quite frankly, I don't want to ruin what this blog is for, which is something unique, and tied in to me. This blog is my adspace. It's where I get to vent and talk about all the daily crap that I can't talk about anywhere else. And, hopefully, all that ventin' and talkin' is edifying to someone out there - or at the least, entertaining. But even if it weren't, I'd probably still be doing it ( although admittedly, probably less ).
And so I am not, nor will I ever sell advertising, on this blog or any other that I run. However, tonight I did put together what I hope will be a happy medium:
If you look to the right, you should see, amongst all the other lists and buttons and whatnot, a PayPal button. My tip-jar, if you will. Now, I'm not begging for cash or anything. Frankly there are better things for you to spend your money on.
But you know what? I've spent a lot of time on this site. I'm approaching four thousand posts over the past two years - well, a little over; the BoW turned 2 last October. Four thousand posts. Now, not all of these posts have been verbose, witty bits of prose, granted. In fact, a lot of them are just quick updates, or re-posts and mentions of pictures and videos and other peoples' articles. And when I look at some of the first posts that I put up on this site ( which are still available if you want a laugh ), it's almost damned painful to read them. But that's still a lot of time, day after day, week after week, month after month, and now, year after year. I've put effort into this blog, and energy. When I haven't felt like it, I've blogged, and when I should have been doing other things, I did this instead.
I'm not saying all of this to say that I deserve your money. There are plenty of bloggers who have worked just as hard, if not harder, than I have who deserve your funds more.
But what I am saying is that, if you feel like it, and you want to chip a few bucks my way, it'd be much appreciated. Writers don't make a lot of money, and I'm no exception. Every dollar helps. But more than money, it'd be a sign that those near-four thousand posts over the past two years haven't gone totally un-noticed.
The Blog of Walker is free, and always will be, and I promise you, the reader, that you'll never see one ad on this site. But, if you feel like showing a token of appreciation, I'd just like to draw your attention to the PayPal button on the right.
Cheers,
Walker
Holy Science, Batman!
So it looks like the Church of Scientology is going to be investigated by Australian authorities over claims from several former Scientologists regarding torture, embezzlement, and forcing members to have abortions. The Times Online has the story:
Read the rest here. Absolutely charming. Why, all of a sudden, do I have the Thomas Dolby song 'She Blinded Me With Science' in my head?
Nick Xenophon, an independent senator, presented letters to the Australian Parliament from seven former Scientologists which he said showed that the secretive church was a front for physical violence, intimidation and blackmail.
“I am deeply concerned about this organisation and the devastating impact it can have on its followers,” he told the Australian Senate in Canberra. He called for a Senate inquiry.
The State Crime Command of New South Wales police yesterday confirmed that Mr Xenophon had handed over the letters for investigation. Fed- eral police have also been contacted.
Kevin Rudd, the Prime Minister,said that many Australians had “real concerns” about Scientology. “I share some of those concerns,” he added. “We would like to proceed in a cautious and methodical way in examining those matters and then we’ll decide what, if further, parliamentary action is necessary.”
Aaron Saxton, a member of the church in Australia and the US between 1989 and 1996, said in one of the letters that he had participated in the “forced confinement and torture” of others. Other letters described how individuals were pressured to hand over large sums of money to the church, leaving them in poverty.
Carmel Underwood, a former executive director of the Sydney branch of the church, wrote that Scientology executives covered up a case of child molestation and pressured pregnant staff to abort their babies so they could keep working for the church. “There are many who are still suffering and being abused financially, physically and mentally,” she wrote.
Kevin Mackey, 46, a farmer, wrote that the church sought cash donations from members for the “crimes” of drinking alcohol or watching pornography.
“Scientology is not a religious organisation — it is a criminal organisation that hides behind its so-called religious beliefs,” Mr Xenophon said. “The letters received by me contain extensive allegations of crimes and abuses that are truly shocking.
“These victims of Scientology claim it is an abusive, manipulative, violent and criminal organisation, and that criminality is condoned at the highest levels.”
The Church of Scientology has dismissed the allegations as “an outrageous abuse of parliamentary privilege” but said that it will co-operate with police. “Senator Xenophon is obviously being pressured by disgruntled former members who use hate speech and distorted accounts of their experiences in the church,” it said. “They are about as reliable as former spouses are when talking about their ex-partner.”
Read the rest here. Absolutely charming. Why, all of a sudden, do I have the Thomas Dolby song 'She Blinded Me With Science' in my head?
No fat jokes!
Those who are, well, in the bubble, I guess, may be aware of Dean del Mont's displeasure at another MP's fat jokes at his expense on Twitter.
Big deal, you're probably saying. Well, yes. It's pretty stupid. So why am I talking about it? Well, mainly because I wanted to highlight this awesome post title from Red Tory: None Shall Call Him FAT!
Heh.
Big deal, you're probably saying. Well, yes. It's pretty stupid. So why am I talking about it? Well, mainly because I wanted to highlight this awesome post title from Red Tory: None Shall Call Him FAT!
Heh.
Well, let's provide an answer for the Globe, shall we?
Via Blazing Cat Fur:
Feel like putting your voting hat on?The Globe asks: Help us select the decade's Nation Builder
I nominated Omar Khadr & Family. Hell they're no worse than some of the previous recipients like Maher Arar. Or you could nominate Mark Steyn or Ezra Levant...hmmm.
Er...about the carbonite-preserved body in my den...
Or, how Scott Feschuk plans to break it to his wife that his new desk is Han Solo's frozen body.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







